In the week after the Supreme Court handed down its anxiously-awaited decision on King v. Burwell, Health Affairs Blog published a series of nine essays analyzing the justices’ opinions and considering the case’s potential long-term impact.
From Tim Jost’s comprehensive review to Abigail Moncrieff’s reflection on the role played by an amicus brief that she drafted, each essay offers a different perspective on the arguments, the Affordable Care Act, and our broader health care system.
Here, readers can browse all of the essays in one place:
The Supreme Court Upholds Tax Credits In The Federal Exchange by Timothy Jost
King v. Burwell And A Right To Health Care by Gregory Curfman
Hearts, Minds, And Health Care Reform by William Sage
What’s Next For The Affordable Care Act? Life After King v. Burwell by Ron Pollack
Post-King: Moving Forward In A New Normal by Sara Rosenbaum
The ACA Survives — But With A Note Of Caution For The Future? by Rachel Sachs
King v. Burwell And The Importance Of State Politics by David K. Jones
After King v. Burwell, A New Opportunity To Build On Early Success by Kathleen Sebelius
The Argument That Wasn’t by Abigail Moncrieff
Now that we know the final outcome, don’t forget to revisit some of the pieces we published immediately before the decision was announced. They include insights still relevant to researchers and policymakers thinking about the next big challenges in health care reform.
A Market-Based Contingency Plan for King v. Burwell by Joseph Antos, James Capretta, Lanhee Chen, Yuval Levin, Thomas Miller, Ramesh Ponnuru, Avik Roy, Gail R. Wilensky, and David Wilson
Supported State-Based Marketplaces: The Point of Convergence? by Christopher Koller
Six Problems With The ACA That Aren’t Going Away by John Goodman
ACA Litigation Beyond King v. Burwell by Timothy Jost
A special thanks to all of our contributors and the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics.
No comments:
Post a Comment